Integrity of artistic image for writing an analysis of literary work
Consciousness can work as a psyche, together with psyche as a awareness. Being a basis, the prerequisites for creative creativity, these edges are inseparably in principle. In science, we rely on a consciousness that operates with essences, trying to eradicate emotions and experiences. In literature and art, emotion contains thought, in thought – feeling. The image is a synthesis of consciousness and psyche, ideas and emotions.
What is the foundation for creative creativity in literary analysis?
This is apparently the actual basis of creativecreativity, which can be feasible just because consciousness and psyche, being autonomous spheres, are in the same time inextricably connected. It’s impossible to lessen the image into the basic idea(to the aim of the ideas): we ought to distract ourselves from feelings. To reduce the image to direct experience way to “not notice” the turnover associated with the psyche, its capability to be fraught with thought.
However, the integrity associated with the image isn’t just a sensually sensed idea (concept). The image is certainly not yet an easy method associated with existence of simultaneously a few principles (a system of concepts). The image is basically multivalued, it simultaneously contains a few aspects. Technology can perhaps not manage this. Concepts reduce an object phenomenon that is( to at least one aspect, as much as one moment, deliberately abstracting from all others. Science explores phenomena analytically with subsequent synthesis, practicing most of the brief moments of interrelation. Art, but, believes in terms of the definitions. Moreover, the clear presence of the amount of meanings is a vital condition for the “life” for the artistic image. It is impractical to determine what could be the meaning that is true what is the “more important” meaning.
Concept of artistic idea of literary work
Theoretically, artistic content may be paid down up to a systematic, up to a logically developed system of concepts. However in training this can be impossible, which is not essential. We are coping with the abyss of definitions. Even on the issue of the look of brand new overtones that are semantic new deep definitions, about “self-production” of definitions in classical works. Since a work could be comprehended towards the end only once absolutely the logical unfolding of pictures is recognized, it can be argued that the informationof a very creative work is an endless procedure.
Therefore, the image is indecomposable. Its perception can only just be holistic: as an experience of thought, as a sensually perceived essence. Which is why the scientific analysis for the tasks are a “double general” cognition of creative integrity: besides that the inexhaustibility of definitions cannot be paid down to a method, with such cognition, the adequate perception of emotions – empathy – is kept from the brackets.
The most full perception for the visual object is constantly multifaceted:
- empathy,
- co-creation,
- way of integrity through medical dialectical logic.
